<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.jvmlangsummit.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Comments</id>
	<title>Comments - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.jvmlangsummit.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Comments"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.jvmlangsummit.com/index.php?title=Comments&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-09-23T10:07:26Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.32.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.jvmlangsummit.com/index.php?title=Comments&amp;diff=41&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Jrose: New page: You have helped to make this a great conference.  Now, can we make it even better next time?  Please copy the following form, then fill and/or adapt it with your responses.  Place the form...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.jvmlangsummit.com/index.php?title=Comments&amp;diff=41&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-09-24T05:02:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: You have helped to make this a great conference.  Now, can we make it even better next time?  Please copy the following form, then fill and/or adapt it with your responses.  Place the form...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;You have helped to make this a great conference.  Now, can we make it even better next time?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please copy the following form, then fill and/or adapt it with your responses.  Place the form at the end of the file in its own section.  Or email it to comments@jvmlangsummit.com.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Commenter contributors will be entered into a door prize drawing.  The prize is a collectable ''HotJava'' tee shirt given out at the SunWorld event at Moscone Center, 5/23/1995.  This was when Sun announced that a future version of Netscape would support Java.  (Thanks, Jerry Neece, for digging this up!  Only non-Sun names will be drawn.  Wish I were eligible to win it.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Comment Form ===&lt;br /&gt;
On a 1-5 scale (5=great!), rate:&lt;br /&gt;
* [12345]  technical quality of sessions&lt;br /&gt;
* [12345]  quality of conversations you had&lt;br /&gt;
* [12345]  effectiveness of conference logistics&lt;br /&gt;
* [12345]  overall impression of the conference&lt;br /&gt;
* [12345]  likelihood you would attend again&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please list and rate five memorable sessions:&lt;br /&gt;
* [12345]&lt;br /&gt;
* [12345]&lt;br /&gt;
* [12345]&lt;br /&gt;
* [12345]&lt;br /&gt;
* [12345]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any comments on other talks?  And how can we do better next time?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sam Sampler ===&lt;br /&gt;
I found the conference heuristic, yet quintessentially quotidian.  The second, third, fifth, seventh, and eleventh talks were primal; most of the others were mere composites of previous presentations.  ''Etc.''&lt;br /&gt;
* 3  technical quality of sessions&lt;br /&gt;
* 5  quality of conversations you had&lt;br /&gt;
* 1  effectiveness of conference logistics&lt;br /&gt;
* 0  overall impression of the conference&lt;br /&gt;
* 10  likelihood you would attend again&lt;br /&gt;
''Etc.''&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jrose</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>