Difference between revisions of "2008 LightningTalks"
From JVMLangSummit
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|Humans and meat-puppets | |Humans and meat-puppets | ||
|As language and platform creators, are we actually attacking and solving the real problems? Or, are we addicted to playing in the same old ghetto? | |As language and platform creators, are we actually attacking and solving the real problems? Or, are we addicted to playing in the same old ghetto? | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Azul Performance Analysis Tool | ||
| + | |Cliff Click | ||
| + | |Day Two, 4:45 | ||
| + | |Why is your code slow? | ||
| + | |Debugged lack-of-inlining in JRuby and lack-of-loop-unrolling in ASM in about 1/2hr each. Fixnum/BigNum costs are high, but perhaps not for why you might expect (it's NOT the GC costs, it's allocation and final fields). | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 14:48, 25 September 2008
Lightning talks are held in the afternoon (~16:30-17:30).
| Title | Presenter | Time & Place | Audience | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optimizing for Agility | Stuart Halloway | Day One, 4:30? | People who prioritize developer performance over language performance | Agility requires smooth adaptation to change. With multiple JVM languages to choose from, you should pick an agile language for most dev, and drop to a performant language occasionally. I'll tell you which is which. :-) |
| Language Addicts Anonymous | John D. Mitchell | Day Two, 4:45 | Humans and meat-puppets | As language and platform creators, are we actually attacking and solving the real problems? Or, are we addicted to playing in the same old ghetto? |
| Azul Performance Analysis Tool | Cliff Click | Day Two, 4:45 | Why is your code slow? | Debugged lack-of-inlining in JRuby and lack-of-loop-unrolling in ASM in about 1/2hr each. Fixnum/BigNum costs are high, but perhaps not for why you might expect (it's NOT the GC costs, it's allocation and final fields). |
