Difference between revisions of "2008 LightningTalks"

From JVMLangSummit
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
!Audience
 
!Audience
 
!Summary
 
!Summary
|-
 
|Foo
 
|Bar
 
|Quux
 
|Click
 
|Clack
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Optimizing for Agility
 
|Optimizing for Agility
Line 19: Line 13:
 
|People who prioritize developer performance over language performance
 
|People who prioritize developer performance over language performance
 
|Agility requires smooth adaptation to change. With multiple JVM languages to choose from, you should pick an agile language for most dev, and drop to a performant language occasionally. I'll tell you which is which. :-)
 
|Agility requires smooth adaptation to change. With multiple JVM languages to choose from, you should pick an agile language for most dev, and drop to a performant language occasionally. I'll tell you which is which. :-)
 +
|-
 +
|Language Addicts Anonymous
 +
|John D. Mitchell
 +
|Day Two, 4:45
 +
|Humans and meat-puppets
 +
|As language and platform creators, are we actually attacking and solving the real problems?  Or, are we addicted to playing in the same old ghetto?
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 11:06, 25 September 2008

Lightning talks are held in the afternoon (~16:30-17:30).

Title Presenter Time & Place Audience Summary
Optimizing for Agility Stuart Halloway Day One, 4:30? People who prioritize developer performance over language performance Agility requires smooth adaptation to change. With multiple JVM languages to choose from, you should pick an agile language for most dev, and drop to a performant language occasionally. I'll tell you which is which. :-)
Language Addicts Anonymous John D. Mitchell Day Two, 4:45 Humans and meat-puppets As language and platform creators, are we actually attacking and solving the real problems? Or, are we addicted to playing in the same old ghetto?