Difference between revisions of "MOP and Invokedynamic"

From JVMLangSummit
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
 
; Project:  
 
; Project:  
 
; Blog:  
 
; Blog:  
; Slides: [[Image:file.pdf]]
+
; Slides: [[Image:Metaobject_Protocol_Meets_Invokedynamic.pdf]]
  
 
=== Abstract ===
 
=== Abstract ===

Latest revision as of 11:13, 17 September 2009

MOP and Indy

Attila Szegedi - Sourceforge.net

Project
Blog
Slides
File:Metaobject Protocol Meets Invokedynamic.pdf

Abstract

Metaobject Protocol Meets Invokedynamic — Attila Szegedi

Having a largely stabilized specification and working implementation of JSR-292 opened the way for a rethinking of the JVM Dynamic Languages Metaobject Protocol as a framework for runtime linking of invokedynamic calls between language runtimes. In this talk, I present the architecture of the framework in its current state: the pluggable linker mechanism, the type conversion subsystem, and the set of conventions that build on top of these two to implement a subset of well-known call identifiers that serve as the metaobject protocol nomenclature commonly understood by dynamic languages.

Background

Current Status

Future

Key Issues for Discussion

(please expand cooperatively)